[Mpi-forum] September MPI Forum / Agenda and Reminder to Register

Thu Sep 4 07:56:36 CDT 2014

Jeff,

The version of the endpoints proposal that was read at the last meeting is
proceeding for a vote, with the addition of ticket 0 changes that the
working group made in response to feedback at the last reading.

My apologies for being a day late on the deadline.  The timing was a little
tricky this time around with the deadline landing on a Monday and a US
holiday.

 ~Jim.

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquyres at cisco.com>
wrote:

> Jim --
>
> I'm sorry, but your mail missed the deadline (I also see you just added a
> new PDF to the ticket about 15 minutes ago).
>
> I think you have the following options:
>
> - proceed with the last version of the ticket that was announced to the
> Forum (as of last meeting?)
> - submit mpi-report.8.pdf for the December meeting
>
>
>
> On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:27 PM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > Apologies for missing the 9/1 deadline.  Endpoints #380 should be up for
> a first vote in Japan.  The working group has made several changes to the
> ticket based on feedback from the prior reading.  We feel that these
> changes are ticket 0, and would like to read them prior to a vote.  If the
> forum feels the changes are not ticket 0, we would like to re-read at the
> Japan meeting.
> >
> > We do have an unmet implementation requirement, which we will satisfy
> prior to the second vote.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >  ~Jim.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji at anl.gov> wrote:
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > This is not a vote, just a formal reading.  We were asked to make some
> changes and read it again at the last meeting.
> >
> >   — Pavan
> >
> > On Sep 2, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Schulz Martin <schulzm at llnl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Pavan,
> > >
> > > I think we can still add this, despite the two week deadline, since we
> did
> > > talk about this in the last meeting. What I don’t remember, though, is
> the
> > > state of the ticket: it’s listed as scheduled for vote and also listed
> as
> > > a reading in the June notes, but the ticket has two options on it and
> it’s
> > > not clear which one is the intended one. What do you want to do with
> it?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ________________________________________________________________________
> > > Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/
> > > CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 9/2/14, 6:12 AM, "Balaji, Pavan" <balaji at anl.gov> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Martin,
> > >>
> > >> You missed 411:
> > >> https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/411
> > >>
> > >> We had decided to postpone it to this meeting last time.
> > >>
> > >> Can you add it too?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> — Pavan
> > >>
> > >> On Sep 2, 2014, at 3:59 AM, Schulz Martin <schulzm at llnl.gov> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Rolf, all,
> > >>>
> > >>> I have updated the agenda with all tickets to be read and voted on -
> I
> > >>> only got Rolf’s request below, please let me know asap in case I
> missed
> > >>> something (plus I moved the first votes from last time up to the
> second
> > >>> vote stage). With that, the agenda should be complete.
> > >>>
> > >>> Rolf: all the tickets are on the agenda. There are a few, though, as
> you
> > >>> also noted, that are ticket 0 changes - I grouped them separately
> with
> > >>> the
> > >>> intent that we don’t vote on them (but if we decide otherwise, they
> > >>> count
> > >>> as announced). I know we are a bit sparse in the chapter committees
> > >>> right
> > >>> now, but we need to fix this anyway to make MPI 3.1 happen. I am
> > >>> planning
> > >>> on pinging people separately about this in the next days - if they
> are
> > >>> any
> > >>> volunteers right away, please let me know.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks!
> > >>>
> > >>> Martin
> > >>>
> > >>>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> > >>> Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/
> > >>> CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 8/28/14, 8:30 AM, "Rolf Rabenseifner" <rabenseifner at hlrs.de>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Dear Martin,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> please add the following errata tickets to the agenda :
> > >>>>
> > >>>> #456 MPI 3.0 Errata: MPI RMA synchronization for MPI shared memory
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This is a large ticket that needs discussion
> > >>>> first in the RMA-WG, second in the plenary, and
> > >>>> hopefully some voting (corrctions and final)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ____
> > >>>> Small Fortran corrections are:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> #433 MPI 3.0 Errata: MPI_WIN_ATTACH must only be for simply
> contiguous
> > >>>> buffers
> > >>>> #440 Fortran cross-reference correction (ticket 0 / errata)
> > >>>> #441 Missing text for Fortran MPI_SUBARRAYS_SUPPORTED equals .FALSE.
> > >>>> (errata)
> > >>>> #442 Fortran "vector subscipts" and MPI_BOTTOM (ticket 0 / errata)
> > >>>> #443 Fortran MPI_BOTTOM not for initialization or assignment
> (ticket 0
> > >>>> /
> > >>>> errata)
> > >>>> #444 Fortran and Persistent Requests (ticket 0 / errata)
> > >>>> #445 Fortran and Permament Data Movement: "All" nonblocking (ticket
> 0 /
> > >>>> errata)
> > >>>> #446 Fortran cross-reference update (ticket-0/errata)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ____
> > >>>> Fortran and absolute address text corrections:
> > >>>> #431 MPI 3.0 Errata: MPI Address Errata
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ____
> > >>>> Errata and ticket-0 additions to tickets #349, #402, #404
> > >>>>     (current status of the triple 1st vote):
> > >>>> #421 MPI_Aint addressing arithmetic (ticket-0 additions)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ____
> > >>>> Small errata corrections to Chap.2:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> #447 Chap.2 errata: Tools section is an exception: no Fortran
> interface
> > >>>> #448 Chap.2 errata: Semantic term "matching" is missing
> > >>>> #449 Chap.2 errata: Missing "in C" in wording about
> handle-comparison
> > >>>> #450 Chap.2 errata: Outdated cross-reference to MPI-1
> > >>>> #451 Chap.2 errata: Correcting description of nonblocking
> > >>>> #452 Chap.2 errata: Wording correction about deprecated and removed
> > >>>> functions
> > >>>> #453 Chap.2 errata: Avoidance of mpi_ / pmpi_ in C due to Fortran
> > >>>> reasons
> > >>>>
> > >>>> #455 Chap.2 errata: Removal of duplicated text on MPI_Aint and
> > >>>> MPI_Offset
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _____________________________________
> > >>>> The rest of this mail are only hints.
> > >>>> ____
> > >>>> I also expect that Jeff may want to update, discuss and vote:
> > >>>> #428 Add more non-profile-able MPI routines
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ____
> > >>>> I also expect that Kathryn may want to update, discuss and vote:
> > >>>> #383 Consistency of tools information interface variable information
> > >>>> #368 MPI_T Minor Errata
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ____
> > >>>> I also expect that Bill may want to update, discuss and vote:
> > >>>> #438 Interpretation of MPI_WIN_BASE for shared memory windows
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ____
> > >>>> Other MPI-3.0 errata tickets that may or should be handled before
> > >>>> MPI-3.1
> > >>>> is finalized:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> #420 Bug in neighbourhood collective example
> > >>>>   - due to missing chapter committee action,
> > >>>>     it shoud be voted in
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ____
> > >>>> The only MPI-3.0-errata ticket that may need to go MPI-4.0 is:
> > >>>> #374 Comm_free/Type_free/Win_free: clarify attribute destructor
> > >>>> semantics
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ____
> > >>>> Tickets #428, #368, #368, #420 may need a milestone-change to
> "Kobe".
> > >>>> Otherwise, they are invisible in the Kobe tickets list:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/query?status=accepted&statu
> > >>>> s=
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> assigned&status=new&status=reopened&milestone=2014%2F09%2F15+Kobe%2C+Jap
> > >>>> an
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> &col=id&col=summary&col=milestone&col=status&col=type&col=priority&col=v
> > >>>> er
> > >>>> sion&order=priority
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best regards
> > >>>> Rolf
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ----- Original Message -----
> > >>>>> From: "Schulz Martin" <schulzm at llnl.gov>
> > >>>>> To: "Main mailing list" <mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org>
> > >>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:53:01 AM
> > >>>>> Subject: [Mpi-forum] September MPI Forum / Agenda and Reminder to
> > >>>>> Register
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Based on the (sparse) feedback that I have gotten, I have assembled
> > >>>>> an
> > >>>>> initial agenda and uploaded it to the server. Please check the
> > >>>>> agenda,
> > >>>>> especially if you sent me a request, and double check that I didn¹t
> > >>>>> miss
> > >>>>> anything or anybody. If something is missing, please let me know
> > >>>>> asap.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> As usual, I tried to split working groups and plenary on separate
> > >>>>> days,
> > >>>>> with votes on day three. However, so far I have only received one
> WG
> > >>>>> meeting request, which would make Monday relatively sparse. We
> could
> > >>>>> move
> > >>>>> parts of Tuesday to that day and probably finish on Tuesday
> evening.
> > >>>>> Some
> > >>>>> people have voiced interest in doing this. However, this would move
> > >>>>> votes
> > >>>>> onto the same day as the second half of the plenary and I would
> like
> > >>>>> some
> > >>>>> feedback on this (since the voting times are typically fixed to the
> > >>>>> last
> > >>>>> day). So the options are:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Monday WG time (with open, general WG time), Tuesday plenary,
> > >>>>> Wednesday
> > >>>>> votes
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -or-
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Monday WG and plenary time (errata), Tuesday plenary and votes,
> > >>>>> Wednesday
> > >>>>> off
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Please let me know if you have a preference one way or the other.
> If
> > >>>>> I
> > >>>>> don¹t hear anything or if there are objections to moving the voting
> > >>>>> block,
> > >>>>> we¹ll leave things as is (first option).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks!
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Martin
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> PS: Please don¹t forget to register, if you haven¹t done so, by the
> > >>>>> end of
> > >>>>> August (just a few days left). We need an exact attendee list, so
> > >>>>> people
> > >>>>> can get access to Riken.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > >>>>> _
> > >>>>> Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/
> > >>>>> CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>> mpi-forum mailing list
> > >>>>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> > >>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Dr. Rolf Rabenseifner . . . . . . . . . .. email
> rabenseifner at hlrs.de
> > >>>> High Performance Computing Center (HLRS) . phone
> ++49(0)711/685-65530
> > >>>> University of Stuttgart . . . . . . . . .. fax ++49(0)711 /
> 685-65832
> > >>>> Head of Dpmt Parallel Computing . . .
> www.hlrs.de/people/rabenseifner
> > >>>> Nobelstr. 19, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany . . . . (Office: Room
> 1.307)
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> mpi-forum mailing list
> > >>>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> > >>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> mpi-forum mailing list
> > >>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> > >>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Pavan Balaji  ✉️
> > >> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> mpi-forum mailing list
> > >> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> > >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > mpi-forum mailing list
> > > mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> > > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> >
> > --
> > Pavan Balaji  ✉️
> > http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpi-forum mailing list
> > mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpi-forum mailing list
> > mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquyres at cisco.com
> For corporate legal information go to:
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpi-forum/attachments/20140904/9078a995/attachment-0001.html>