[Mpi-forum] Better Use of Time Monday Afternoon

[Graham, Richard L.]

This is a fair suggestion - actually Josh and I talked about this before this was sent out.  From what I hear now, seems like the discussions with the RMA group and the I/O folks are going fine, and seems like the open issues with the fault-stabalization proposal should be ironed out very soon.  The other 2 proposals will get a first discussion in the WG this week, and then we should have an idea where things stand, and can make an informed decision.

Rich

On Feb 7, 2012, at 5:39 PM, Bronis R. de Supinski wrote:

> 
> Rich:
> 
> I have been lurking on the FT mailing list and
> I have observed that we are far from agreement
> on the form of interface on which we should
> standardize, let alone how to spell it. While
> I appreciate the time that you and Josh have put
> into the RTS proposal, it is clear that we should
> not adopt it at this time. As a result, I
> respectfully comment that a reading of the RTS
> ticket on Monday afternoon is not a productive
> use of the Forum's time. I think it would be much
> better to review the new proposals (and perhaps
> changes to the RTS proposal). Further, since we
> are already running long for this March meeting,
> we should reduce the session to a more reasonable
> two or three hours and not five.
> 
> I relaize that you are free to insist on reading
> the ticket. However, I do not see the benefit of
> ramming through the reading only to have it almost
> certainly be defeated when it comes time to vote.
> 
> Bronis
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum