[Mpi3-tools] My comments on the MQS draft

[Kathryn Mohror]

Hi Jeff,

Here's what I have from my notes from the forum. The straw vote breakdown was:

option 1: 5
option 2: 15
option 3: 2

I had to go back to your slides to remember what option 2 was! It was the single side document option.

Kathryn

On May 2, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquyres at cisco.com> wrote:

> Anh --
> 
> Nicely done.  Attached is a scan of my comments on the draft.  We can chat about them on a phone call if they don't make sense...
> 
> One big comment: didn't we agree at the last Forum meeting to have 1 big document with MPIR and MQS (and whatever else we dream up)?  I can't find the notes from last meeting to remember what the Forum decided.  If we did agree on one document: now that much of the MQS text has been written, perhaps it would make sense to combine these into a single doc...?
> 
> -- 
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquyres at cisco.com
> For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
> <2013_05_02_14_39_09-mqs-draft.pdf>_______________________________________________
> Mpi3-tools mailing list
> Mpi3-tools at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-tools

______________________________________________________________
Kathryn Mohror, kathryn at llnl.gov, http://people.llnl.gov/mohror1
CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-tools/attachments/20130502/b1a6953d/attachment-0001.html>