[mpiwg-rma] #401: MPI_IN_PLACE in Fetching RMA Atomics
Jeff Hammond
jeff.science at gmail.com
Wed Dec 10 13:47:01 CST 2014
I have added the proposed text changes. WG members should review at
their earliest convenience.
Thanks,
Jeff
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: MPI Forum <mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org>
Date: Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [MPI Forum] #401: MPI_IN_PLACE in Fetching RMA Atomics
To:
#401: MPI_IN_PLACE in Fetching RMA Atomics
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jdinan | Owner: jdinan
Type: Enhancements to standard | Status: assigned
Priority: Not ready / author | Milestone: 2014/12/08
rework | California, USA
Version: MPI 3.1 | Resolution:
Keywords: RMA | Implementation status: Unnecessary
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by gropp):
The working group would like to see a detailed proposal for each routine.
The use of MPI_IN_PLACE should match the style in similar MPI routines.
The buffering implications of each option needs to be considered and
discussed on a routine-by-routine basis.
--
Ticket URL: <https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/401#comment:10>
MPI Forum <https://svn.mpi-forum.org/>
MPI Forum
--
Jeff Hammond
jeff.science at gmail.com
http://jeffhammond.github.io/
More information about the mpiwg-rma
mailing list