[mpiwg-rma] #401: MPI_IN_PLACE in Fetching RMA Atomics

Jeff Hammond jeff.science at gmail.com
Wed Dec 10 13:47:01 CST 2014


I have added the proposed text changes.  WG members should review at
their earliest convenience.

Thanks,

Jeff

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: MPI Forum <mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org>
Date: Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [MPI Forum] #401: MPI_IN_PLACE in Fetching RMA Atomics
To:


#401: MPI_IN_PLACE in Fetching RMA Atomics
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter:  jdinan                    |                  Owner:  jdinan
    Type:  Enhancements to standard  |                 Status:  assigned
Priority:  Not ready / author        |              Milestone:  2014/12/08
  rework                             |  California, USA
 Version:  MPI 3.1                   |             Resolution:
Keywords:  RMA                       |  Implementation status:  Unnecessary
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by gropp):

 The working group would like to see a detailed proposal for each routine.
 The use of MPI_IN_PLACE should match the style in similar MPI routines.
 The buffering implications of each option needs to be considered and
 discussed on a routine-by-routine basis.

--
Ticket URL: <https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/401#comment:10>
MPI Forum <https://svn.mpi-forum.org/>
MPI Forum


-- 
Jeff Hammond
jeff.science at gmail.com
http://jeffhammond.github.io/



More information about the mpiwg-rma mailing list