[mpiwg-rma] iflush ticket needed

[Jeff Hammond]

We really need a ticket i.e. a substantive written proposal for
iflush, etc. in order to make progress on the umbrella topic that
includes it and #459.

Pavan: Please let me know when you will have something for this.

Jeff


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: MPI Forum <mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org>
Date: Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: [MPI Forum] #459: RMA sync ops with vector of windows
To:


#459: RMA sync ops with vector of windows
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter:  jhammond                  |                  Owner:  jhammond
    Type:  New routine(s)            |                 Status:  assigned
Priority:  Not ready / author        |              Milestone:  2014/12/08
  rework                             |  California, USA
 Version:  MPI 4.0                   |             Resolution:
Keywords:  RMA                       |  Implementation status:  Waiting
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by gropp):

 The WG found this interesting, but notes that there are alternatives that
 may provide the same capability.  These include nonblocking flush.  In a
 straw vote,  iflush received 11 votes and nflush received 3; in contrast,
 nsync received 9 and isync received 4.

--
Ticket URL: <https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/459#comment:3>
MPI Forum <https://svn.mpi-forum.org/>
MPI Forum


-- 
Jeff Hammond
jeff.science at gmail.com
http://jeffhammond.github.io/