[mpiwg-rma] [EXTERNAL] ticket 369

Jim Dinan james.dinan at gmail.com
Tue Oct 22 12:36:54 CDT 2013


It's also time to bring MPI_Aint_add() forward for a reading.

 ~Jim.


On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Barrett, Brian W <bwbarre at sandia.gov>wrote:

> On 10/22/13 8:48 AM, "Jeff Hammond" <jeff.science at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>Can we approve this in the WG and move for a vote in December?  Seems
> >>>like a trivial addition.
> >>>
> >>>https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/369
> >>
> >> Unless we changed the rules, I think the best we can do is read in
> >> December and vote in March.  We probably couldn't call it an errata
> >>item,
> >> since its a new feature, not a bug.
> >
> >Yeah, that sounds more like the procedure we should follow.  I just
> >want to get the ball rolling in December.
>
> Yes, we should definitely have a reading ready for December (or figure out
> how we want to handle the bunch of small changes Jeff has suggested).
>
> Brian
>
> --
>   Brian W. Barrett
>   Scalable System Software Group
>   Sandia National Laboratories
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-rma mailing list
> mpiwg-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-rma
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-rma/attachments/20131022/e40abb0d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the mpiwg-rma mailing list