[Mpi3-rma] [EXTERNAL] Re: Call for errata

Barrett, Brian W bwbarre at sandia.gov
Tue Jan 29 15:07:45 CST 2013


On 1/29/13 3:34 AM, "Rolf Rabenseifner" <rabenseifner at hlrs.de> wrote:

>For MPI-next, errata should be noticed through two marks:


>I hope that this will work fine for the future and
>with a minimum of overhead.

Where did this proposal come from?  It certainly wasn't from the main
Forum body or from the architecture review board.  I doubt it came from
the steering committee as a whole.  There's absolutely no reason to use
prefixes in the title rather than versions (one now exists for MPI-3.0
errata).  We should use the tools to their full effect, rather than doing
error-prone things like prefixes.  And we should all agree on policies and
procedures, rather than one person coming up with something and stating it
as fact.


  Brian W. Barrett
  Scalable System Software Group
  Sandia National Laboratories

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 454 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-rma/attachments/20130129/d0bc0fb0/attachment-0001.bin>

More information about the mpiwg-rma mailing list