[mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change

Wed Jun 8 17:04:07 CDT 2016

Hi,

I may have a simple way of fixing my changes which, if it works, could be
used to fix Dan’s changes.  Let me see what I can do.
	- Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces at mpi-forum.org> on behalf of
Jeff Hammond <jeff.science at gmail.com>
Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org>
Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 5:00 PM
To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org" <mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org>
Cc: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
<mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change

>mea culpa
>
>
>i'll provide free coffee to whoever fixes my bug.  you can collect your
>free coffee at any Intel campus ;-)
>
>
>jeff
>
>
>On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Steven Oyanagi
><sko at cray.com> wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>First off, sorry, but I probably won’t be able to get the changes done
>today.  At this point I suspect you don’t need them for this meeting.  If
>you do, let me know and I will try to get them done quick.
>
>I do note we have not be consistent about putting things in as \MPI/.  I
>note that Jeff Hammond’s change on Mar 1 (7c911456d - change process to
>MPI process) did not use \MPI/.  Pavan’s mod is right, it did use \MPI/.
>Dan’s mod (12aa5e1c -  Clarification of word 'process', pages 101-200 from
>Feb 5th does *not* use \MPI/, it inserts “MPI “.  It may be I looked at
>Dan’s mod and thought it was Pavan’s.
>        - Steve
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Pavan Balaji <balaji at anl.gov>
>Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 2:28 PM
>To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
><mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>Cc: Pavan Balaji <balaji at anl.gov>, Steve Oyanagi <sko at cray.com>
>Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
>
>>Steve,
>>
>>You should use \MPI/ in latex.
>>
>>  -- Pavan
>>
>>> On Jun 8, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Steven Oyanagi <sko at cray.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Sorry, I was unclear in my last message.  Changes were made per the
>>>review
>>> of changes for pages 201-300 in previous working group meetings.  My
>>> inquiry was about the changes to the TEX source of the MPI standard.
>>>Did I
>>> have to do anything unusual in the case where “MPI “ was inserted?  I
>>>just
>>> inserted the string “MPI “ in those cases.  MPI isn’t some special tag
>>> that has be denoted in an different way, is it?
>>>      - Steve
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Steve Oyanagi <sko at cray.com>
>>> Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 11:27 AM
>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I think I have the changes for 201-300 done and correctly committed to
>>>>the
>>>> branch.  Please check that I got the git stuff correct, and take a
>>>>glance
>>>> at my commit to make sure I didn’t forget to do something.  I assume
>>>>in
>>>> most cases I just had to insert “MPI “ before process.  Was I suppose
>>>>to
>>>> do anything else?
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know if further changes are needed.
>>>>     - Steve
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Steve Oyanagi <sko at cray.com>
>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 6:12 PM
>>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> FYI - I have the changes done, just need to proof-read a bit and then
>>>>> will
>>>>> commit, probably tonight or tomorrow morning.  Hope that’s soon
>>>>>enough
>>>>> for
>>>>> you folks.
>>>>>    - Steve
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces at mpi-forum.org> on behalf
>>>>>of
>>>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji at anl.gov>
>>>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org"
>>>>><mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org>
>>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:46 PM
>>>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
>>>>>
>>>>>> Steve,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.  If you are unable to push the changes in due to access
>>>>>>regions,
>>>>>> you can send your patch to me.  I'll apply it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll try to figure out who can make the change to the reply-to
>>>>>>field.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Pavan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jun 7, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Steven Oyanagi <sko at cray.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Pavan,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry, I never got around to actually making the changes.  I had
>>>>>>> problems
>>>>>>> finding the repositories until I
>>>>>>> discovered that I had never gotten access to them.  Since then I
>>>>>>>ran
>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>> of time to work on the changes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now that they are a priority, I will try to get this done quickly.
>>>>>>> Most
>>>>>>> of the changes are straight-forward.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also - E-mail from he mailing list comes with the wrong “Reply-To”
>>>>>>> field.
>>>>>>> I got burned by this once before (Jim Dinan graciously pointed me
>>>>>>>to
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> right address) but I didn’t realize the issue was in the message.
>>>>>>>I
>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>> the “Reply-to” field below should be
>>>>>>> "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org”.
>>>>>>> Note that the address in the Reply-to field is missing the “lists.”
>>>>>>> part.
>>>>>>>  - Steve
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces at mpi-forum.org> on
>>>>>>>behalf
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji at anl.gov>
>>>>>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org"
>>>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org>
>>>>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:19 PM
>>>>>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
>>>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>>>>>>> Subject: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Steve,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We had gone over your changes from "process" to "MPI process" for
>>>>>>>> pages
>>>>>>>> 201-300 in one of the previous telecons, but we don't see your
>>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> git.  Did you commit your changes in?  If not, can you please
>>>>>>>>commit
>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>> as soon as possible into the `origin/hybrid-process-clarification`
>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>> on git at github.com:mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard.git?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- Pavan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org
>>>>>>>> 
>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org
>>>>>>> 
>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org
>>>>>> 
>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>> mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org
>>> 
>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
><http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org
>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Jeff Hammond
>jeff.science at gmail.com
>http://jeffhammond.github.io/
>