[mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change

[Jeff Hammond]

mea culpa

i'll provide free coffee to whoever fixes my bug.  you can collect your
free coffee at any Intel campus ;-)

jeff

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Steven Oyanagi <sko at cray.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> First off, sorry, but I probably won’t be able to get the changes done
> today.  At this point I suspect you don’t need them for this meeting.  If
> you do, let me know and I will try to get them done quick.
>
> I do note we have not be consistent about putting things in as \MPI/.  I
> note that Jeff Hammond’s change on Mar 1 (7c911456d - change process to
> MPI process) did not use \MPI/.  Pavan’s mod is right, it did use \MPI/.
> Dan’s mod (12aa5e1c -  Clarification of word 'process', pages 101-200 from
> Feb 5th does *not* use \MPI/, it inserts “MPI “.  It may be I looked at
> Dan’s mod and thought it was Pavan’s.
>         - Steve
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pavan Balaji <balaji at anl.gov>
> Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 2:28 PM
> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
> Cc: Pavan Balaji <balaji at anl.gov>, Steve Oyanagi <sko at cray.com>
> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
>
> >Steve,
> >
> >You should use \MPI/ in latex.
> >
> >  -- Pavan
> >
> >> On Jun 8, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Steven Oyanagi <sko at cray.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Sorry, I was unclear in my last message.  Changes were made per the
> >>review
> >> of changes for pages 201-300 in previous working group meetings.  My
> >> inquiry was about the changes to the TEX source of the MPI standard.
> >>Did I
> >> have to do anything unusual in the case where “MPI “ was inserted?  I
> >>just
> >> inserted the string “MPI “ in those cases.  MPI isn’t some special tag
> >> that has be denoted in an different way, is it?
> >>      - Steve
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Steve Oyanagi <sko at cray.com>
> >> Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 11:27 AM
> >> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
> >> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I think I have the changes for 201-300 done and correctly committed to
> >>>the
> >>> branch.  Please check that I got the git stuff correct, and take a
> >>>glance
> >>> at my commit to make sure I didn’t forget to do something.  I assume in
> >>> most cases I just had to insert “MPI “ before process.  Was I suppose
> >>>to
> >>> do anything else?
> >>>
> >>> Please let me know if further changes are needed.
> >>>     - Steve
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Steve Oyanagi <sko at cray.com>
> >>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 6:12 PM
> >>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
> >>> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
> >>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
> >>>
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> FYI - I have the changes done, just need to proof-read a bit and then
> >>>> will
> >>>> commit, probably tonight or tomorrow morning.  Hope that’s soon enough
> >>>> for
> >>>> you folks.
> >>>>    - Steve
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces at mpi-forum.org> on behalf
> >>>>of
> >>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji at anl.gov>
> >>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org"
> >>>><mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org>
> >>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:46 PM
> >>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
> >>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
> >>>> Subject: Re: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
> >>>>
> >>>>> Steve,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks.  If you are unable to push the changes in due to access
> >>>>>regions,
> >>>>> you can send your patch to me.  I'll apply it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'll try to figure out who can make the change to the reply-to field.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -- Pavan
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Jun 7, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Steven Oyanagi <sko at cray.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Pavan,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sorry, I never got around to actually making the changes.  I had
> >>>>>> problems
> >>>>>> finding the repositories until I
> >>>>>> discovered that I had never gotten access to them.  Since then I ran
> >>>>>> out
> >>>>>> of time to work on the changes.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Now that they are a priority, I will try to get this done quickly.
> >>>>>> Most
> >>>>>> of the changes are straight-forward.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Also - E-mail from he mailing list comes with the wrong “Reply-To”
> >>>>>> field.
> >>>>>> I got burned by this once before (Jim Dinan graciously pointed me to
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>> right address) but I didn’t realize the issue was in the message.  I
> >>>>>> think
> >>>>>> the “Reply-to” field below should be
> >>>>>> "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org”.
> >>>>>> Note that the address in the Reply-to field is missing the “lists.”
> >>>>>> part.
> >>>>>>  - Steve
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: mpiwg-hybridpm <mpiwg-hybridpm-bounces at mpi-forum.org> on
> >>>>>>behalf
> >>>>>> of
> >>>>>> Pavan Balaji <balaji at anl.gov>
> >>>>>> Reply-To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org"
> >>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org>
> >>>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:19 PM
> >>>>>> To: "mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
> >>>>>> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
> >>>>>> Subject: [mpiwg-hybridpm] Process -> MPI process change
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Steve,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We had gone over your changes from "process" to "MPI process" for
> >>>>>>> pages
> >>>>>>> 201-300 in one of the previous telecons, but we don't see your
> >>>>>>> changes
> >>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>> git.  Did you commit your changes in?  If not, can you please
> >>>>>>>commit
> >>>>>>> them
> >>>>>>> as soon as possible into the `origin/hybrid-process-clarification`
> >>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>> on git at github.com:mpiwg-hybrid/mpi-standard.git?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -- Pavan
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
> >>>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org
> >>>>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
> >>>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org
> >>>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
> >>>>> mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org
> >>>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
> >> mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org
> >> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
> mpiwg-hybridpm at mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>



-- 
Jeff Hammond
jeff.science at gmail.com
http://jeffhammond.github.io/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-hybridpm/attachments/20160608/7b5b4e13/attachment-0001.html>