[mpiwg-hybridpm] Clarification of word 'process'

[Jeff Hammond]

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Daniel Holmes <dholmes at epcc.ed.ac.uk>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have just pushed a new branch into our mpiwg-hybrid git repo called
> "hybrid-process-clarification".
> It contains one commit: "Clarification of word 'process', pages 101-200".
> I am anticipating that each person's changes can be recorded as a commit
> with a similar message to aid identification.
>
> There are a few instances that need discussion - specifically, when the
> new MPI_AINT arithmetic functions are talking about the scope of validity
> for the resulting addresses should that be OS process or MPI process?
>
>
Let's default to MPI process unless someone can demonstrate both a use case
and prove that one can reliably support OS processes.

Jeff


> Cheers,
> Dan.
>
> --
> Dan Holmes
> Applications Consultant in HPC Research
> EPCC, The University of Edinburgh
> James Clerk Maxwell Building
> The Kings Buildings
> Peter Guthrie Tait Road
> Edinburgh
> EH9 3FD
> T: +44(0)131 651 3465
> E: dholmes at epcc.ed.ac.uk
>
> *Please consider the environment before printing this email.*
>
>
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>



-- 
Jeff Hammond
jeff.science at gmail.com
http://jeffhammond.github.io/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-hybridpm/attachments/20160205/e766eda0/attachment-0001.html>