[mpiwg-hybridpm] Clarification of word 'process'

[Balaji, Pavan]

I've pushed the changes for pages 1-100 as well (plus the front matter before page 1).  I have a bunch of notes on my changes that I'd like to discuss on the call tomorrow.

  -- Pavan

> On Feb 5, 2016, at 1:31 PM, Daniel Holmes <dholmes at epcc.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I have just pushed a new branch into our mpiwg-hybrid git repo called "hybrid-process-clarification".
> It contains one commit: "Clarification of word 'process', pages 101-200".
> I am anticipating that each person's changes can be recorded as a commit with a similar message to aid identification.
> 
> There are a few instances that need discussion - specifically, when the new MPI_AINT arithmetic functions are talking about the scope of validity for the resulting addresses should that be OS process or MPI process?
> 
> Cheers,
> Dan.
> 
> -- 
> Dan Holmes
> Applications Consultant in HPC Research
> EPCC, The University of Edinburgh
> James Clerk Maxwell Building
> The Kings Buildings
> Peter Guthrie Tait Road
> Edinburgh
> EH9 3FD
> T: +44(0)131 651 3465
> E: dholmes at epcc.ed.ac.uk
> 
> *Please consider the environment before printing this email.*
> 
> 
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm