[mpiwg-hybridpm] Fwd: [Mpi-forum] December 2014 Meeting / Agenda

[Balaji, Pavan]

I'd like to ask for some WG time too.

So reading + plenary + WG time?

 -- Pavan

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 9, 2014, at 8:29 PM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com<mailto:james.dinan at gmail.com>> wrote:

I haven't figure out yet whether I will be attending.  If I do, I would like to do a plenary session to present my SC paper on endpoints.  We're planning to do the formal reading of endpoints at this meeting.

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji at anl.gov<mailto:balaji at anl.gov>> wrote:

Do we need WG or plenary time at the next meeting?

  — Pavan

Begin forwarded message:

Date: November 4, 2014 at 12:09:51 AM CST
From: Schulz Martin <schulzm at llnl.gov<mailto:schulzm at llnl.gov>>
To: Main mailing list <mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org>>
Subject: [Mpi-forum] December 2014 Meeting / Agenda
Reply-To: Main MPI Forum mailing list <mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org>>

Hi all,

I put up an initial roster for the December meeting in San Jose. As usual, I am planning to arrange WG meeting in the beginning of the meeting (until Tuesday noon or evening depending on the requests that I get), followed by the plenaries. Votes will be Thursday morning.

For the plenaries, I would like to try something different, based on the experience at the forum in Japan: instead of having a fixed schedule, I’ll put up a list of topics that we need to cover and we’ll go through them in order, but not necessarily with a fixed schedule. We basically followed this scheme in Japan (out of necessity since we had to redo the agenda on the fly due to the missed quorum) and this worked fairly well and allowed for enough discussions for the topics that needed them. I’ll still try to keep track of overall time to make sure we get through with the agenda, in particular with the items to be voted on, but I would like to avoid that this dictates the schedule.

For the WG leads: please send me any requests for WG time or plenary items as soon as you can (even if you need to revise that later), so we can start building a more concrete agenda. Also, please let me know of any tickets that you want read or voted on as part of errata. I have pre-populated the agenda with the second and first votes, since those are fixed – but please also double check those. The deadline for announcing tickets for readings or votes is as usual 2 weeks before the forum, which is the Monday 11/24, I.e., the Monday of Thanksgiving week.

Thanks!

Martin



________________________________________________________________________
Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov<mailto:schulzm at llnl.gov>, http://scalability.llnl.gov/
CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA

_______________________________________________
mpi-forum mailing list
mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org>
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum

--
Pavan Balaji  ✉️
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji


_______________________________________________
mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm

_______________________________________________
mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-hybridpm/attachments/20141110/ae81579e/attachment-0001.html>