[mpiwg-hybridpm] Fwd: [Mpi-forum] December 2014 Meeting / Agenda

[Jim Dinan]

Sounds good.  Thanks!

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji at anl.gov> wrote:

>
>  I'd like to ask for some WG time too.
>
>  So reading + plenary + WG time?
>
>  -- Pavan
>
>  Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 9, 2014, at 8:29 PM, Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>   I haven't figure out yet whether I will be attending.  If I do, I would
> like to do a plenary session to present my SC paper on endpoints.  We're
> planning to do the formal reading of endpoints at this meeting.
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Balaji, Pavan <balaji at anl.gov> wrote:
>
>>
>>  Do we need WG or plenary time at the next meeting?
>>
>>    — Pavan
>>
>>  Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> *Date: *November 4, 2014 at 12:09:51 AM CST
>>  *From: *Schulz Martin <schulzm at llnl.gov>
>>  *To: *Main mailing list <mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>>  *Subject: **[Mpi-forum] December 2014 Meeting / Agenda*
>>  *Reply-To: *Main MPI Forum mailing list <mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>>
>>   Hi all,
>>
>>  I put up an initial roster for the December meeting in San Jose. As
>> usual, I am planning to arrange WG meeting in the beginning of the meeting
>> (until Tuesday noon or evening depending on the requests that I get),
>> followed by the plenaries. Votes will be Thursday morning.
>>
>>  For the plenaries, I would like to try something different, based on
>> the experience at the forum in Japan: instead of having a fixed schedule,
>> I’ll put up a list of topics that we need to cover and we’ll go through
>> them in order, but not necessarily with a fixed schedule. We basically
>> followed this scheme in Japan (out of necessity since we had to redo the
>> agenda on the fly due to the missed quorum) and this worked fairly well and
>> allowed for enough discussions for the topics that needed them. I’ll still
>> try to keep track of overall time to make sure we get through with the
>> agenda, in particular with the items to be voted on, but I would like to
>> avoid that this dictates the schedule.
>>
>>  For the WG leads: please send me any requests for WG time or plenary
>> items as soon as you can (even if you need to revise that later), so we can
>> start building a more concrete agenda. Also, please let me know of any
>> tickets that you want read or voted on as part of errata. I have
>> pre-populated the agenda with the second and first votes, since those are
>> fixed – but please also double check those. The deadline for announcing
>> tickets for readings or votes is as usual 2 weeks before the forum, which
>> is the Monday 11/24, I.e., the Monday of Thanksgiving week.
>>
>>  Thanks!
>>
>>  Martin
>>
>>
>>
>>  ________________________________________________________________________
>> Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/
>> CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA
>>
>>    _______________________________________________
>> mpi-forum mailing list
>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>>
>>
>>   --
>> Pavan Balaji  ✉️
>> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>>
>
>   _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
> mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-hybridpm
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-hybridpm/attachments/20141110/c664fcac/attachment-0001.html>