[Mpi3-hybridpm] Reminder for telecon tomorrow
Douglas Miller
dougmill at us.ibm.com
Tue Feb 16 07:49:29 CST 2010
I am definitely thinking about OpenMP and how best to use it, but of course
we can't depend on it being used in all cases so we have to have solutions
that work with pthreads or other mechanisms for parallelism.
_______________________________________________
Douglas Miller BlueGene Messaging Development
IBM Corp., Rochester, MN USA Bldg 030-2 A410
dougmill at us.ibm.com Douglas Miller/Rochester/IBM
"an Mey, Dieter"
<anmey at rz.rwth-aa
chen.de> To
Sent by: "mpi3-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org"
mpi3-hybridpm-bou <mpi3-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
nces at lists.mpi-fo cc
rum.org
Subject
Re: [Mpi3-hybridpm] Reminder for
02/16/2010 05:08 telecon tomorrow
AM
Please respond to
mpi3-hybridpm at lis
ts.mpi-forum.org
Dear all,
I subscribed to this list only recently in order to get an impression on
how MPI is evolving concerning hybrid parallelization.
I am participating in the OpenMP Language Committee and I am wondering in
how far OpenMP is of any concern.
Best regards,
Dieter
--
Dipl.-Math. Dieter an Mey, HPC Team Lead
RWTH Aachen University, Center for Computing and Communication
Rechen- und Kommunikationszentrum der RWTH Aachen
Seffenter Weg 23, D 52074 Aachen (Germany)
Phone: + 49 241 80 24377 - Fax/UMS: + 49 241 80 624377
mailto:anmey at rz.rwth-aachen.de http://www.rz.rwth-aachen.de
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpi3-hybridpm-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi3-hybridpm-
> bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Pavan Balaji
> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 1:25 AM
> To: mpi3-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
> Subject: Re: [Mpi3-hybridpm] Reminder for telecon tomorrow
>
>
> On 02/15/2010 02:51 PM, Douglas Miller wrote:
> > Here is the document for starting a discussion on additional
> parallelism
> > models.
>
> Thanks Doug. I think the biggest issue here is the lack of a concrete
> API and semantics. This (at least for me) was the cause of the most
> confusion. That is, can a user provide a helper thread to the MPI
> implementation for a random period of time? How does the thread detach
> (does some other thread detach or does the MPI implementation "let go"
> of the thread when it's done)?
>
> If you can add some notes about these, that'll be great. Either ways,
> we
> can discuss these issues during tomorrow's call.
>
> -- Pavan
>
> --
> Pavan Balaji
> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
> _______________________________________________
> Mpi3-hybridpm mailing list
> Mpi3-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-hybridpm
_______________________________________________
Mpi3-hybridpm mailing list
Mpi3-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-hybridpm
More information about the mpiwg-hybridpm
mailing list