[MPI3 Fortran] What to do with mpif.h in MPI-3?

Jeff Squyres jsquyres at cisco.com
Tue Jan 26 11:44:39 CST 2010

On Jan 26, 2010, at 11:02 AM, Torsten Hoefler wrote:

> I agree to both of you, thus, we should not talk about F77 bindings in
> the future. I propose to use the terms F90 bindings and "type-safe F90"
> to distinguish between the old and the new bindings. We should also
> check the standard and all new proposals for consistency.

I was differentiating between them as follows:

- mpif.h / implicit bindings
- use mpi / F90-style explicit bindings
- use mpi3 / proposed F03-style explicit bindings

Jeff Squyres
jsquyres at cisco.com

More information about the mpiwg-fortran mailing list