[Mpi3-bwcompat] MPI Backward Compatibility Working Group

[Jeff Squyres]

The thought on the call was that Quincey would add text about MPI_Offset (to this new section) when he does the ticket covering more IO things.

Do we want to add the text about Offset now?

REMINDER: We need to get this done TODAY to qualify for a formal reading at the Forum meeting.

I attached section 2.5.8 with the changes I proposed -- **INCLUDING** the rationale section (but without text about Offset).

Comments?

On Mar 13, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Fab Tillier wrote:

> Only open, as far as I can tell, is Rajeev's question about making MPI_Count at least as big as the biggest of {int,MPI_Aint, MPI_Offset}.  We've covered the first two, but not MPI_Offset.
> 
> -Fab


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres_at_[hidden]
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/




* 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: section-258-mpi-count.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 241124 bytes
Desc: section-258-mpi-count.pdf
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpi3-bwcompat/attachments/20110314/14b9b421/attachment.pdf>