[Mpi3-bwcompat] MPI Backward Compatibility Working Group

[Quincey Koziol]

On Mar 14, 2011, at 9:52 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:

> The thought on the call was that Quincey would add text about MPI_Offset (to this new section) when he does the ticket covering more IO things.

        Yup, I'm still planning to do that.

                Quincey

> 
> Do we want to add the text about Offset now?
> 
> REMINDER: We need to get this done TODAY to qualify for a formal reading at the Forum meeting.
> 
> I attached section 2.5.8 with the changes I proposed -- **INCLUDING** the rationale section (but without text about Offset).
> 
> Comments?
> 
> 
> On Mar 13, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Fab Tillier wrote:
> 
>> Only open, as far as I can tell, is Rajeev's question about making MPI_Count at least as big as the biggest of {int,MPI_Aint, MPI_Offset}.  We've covered the first two, but not MPI_Offset.
>> 
>> -Fab
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquyres_at_[hidden]
> For corporate legal information go to:
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
> <section-258-mpi-count.pdf>_______________________________________________
> Mpi3-bwcompat mailing list
> Mpi3-bwcompat_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-bwcompat