[Mpi-forum] another request for iaccept

[Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)]

> On Feb 25, 2016, at 2:01 PM, William Gropp <wgropp at illinois.edu> wrote:
> 
> Part of that proposal must explain why using Accept in a separate thread (as suggested by this very post) isn’t sufficient.

Is it different than the rationale for other non-blocking MPI operations?

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres at cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/