[Mpi-forum] another request for iaccept

Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) jsquyres at cisco.com
Thu Feb 25 14:40:38 CST 2016

> On Feb 25, 2016, at 2:01 PM, William Gropp <wgropp at illinois.edu> wrote:
> Part of that proposal must explain why using Accept in a separate thread (as suggested by this very post) isn’t sufficient.

Is it different than the rationale for other non-blocking MPI operations?

Jeff Squyres
jsquyres at cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

More information about the mpi-forum mailing list