[Mpi-forum] another request for iaccept
wgropp at illinois.edu
Thu Feb 25 14:01:07 CST 2016
Part of that proposal must explain why using Accept in a separate thread (as suggested by this very post) isn’t sufficient.
Director, Parallel Computing Institute
Thomas M. Siebel Chair in Computer Science
Chief Scientist, NCSA
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
On Feb 25, 2016, at 1:56 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquyres at cisco.com> wrote:
> FWIW, I don't think the issue has been a lack of use cases. I think that the issue has been no one has been willing to create a proposal and shepherd it through.
> Sent from my phone. No type good.
>> On Feb 25, 2016, at 9:33 AM, Rob Latham <robl at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>> Every 3-4 years I come across someone who wants to use a non-blocking accept, and the response is "the forum considered it but did not find a use case". Here's another end-user wishing for an iaccept:
>> mpi-forum mailing list
>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
More information about the mpi-forum