[Mpi-forum] another request for iaccept

[Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)]

FWIW, I don't think the issue has been a lack of use cases. I think that the issue has been no one has been willing to create a proposal and shepherd it through. 

Sent from my phone. No type good. 

> On Feb 25, 2016, at 9:33 AM, Rob Latham <robl at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> 
> Every 3-4 years I come across someone who wants to use a non-blocking accept, and the response is "the forum considered it but did not find a use case".   Here's another end-user wishing for an iaccept:
> 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mpi4py/nSy17SavJnI/8EyfKT4-IAAJ
> 
> ==rob
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum