[Mpi-forum] Status of vendor MPI 3.0 RMA implementations

Jesper Larsson Träff traff at par.tuwien.ac.at
Tue Mar 25 08:26:02 CDT 2014


indeed (thanks Jeff, thanks Rajeev)

Best,
Jesper

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 08:20:02AM -0500, Rajeev Thakur wrote:
> He is probably referring to the document attached to this message:
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/2013-July/001214.html
> 
> Rajeev
> 
> On Mar 25, 2014, at 2:57 AM, Jesper Larsson Träff <traff at par.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Hi Jeff,
> > 
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 09:27:12AM -0500, Jeff Hammond wrote:
> >> A CMU grad student wrote an arXiv paper (Rajeev may have shared it to
> >> the Forum already, else I can repost) that summarized
> >> application/library usage of MPI with an emphasis on coverage.  While
> >> it was a small set of codes, the coverage of the standard was pretty
> >> good (in part because yours truly suggested some projects that very
> >> aggressively adopt new features of the MPI standard).
> >> 
> > 
> > that sounds interesting, can you cite a link?
> > 
> > Jesper
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpi-forum mailing list
> > mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum



More information about the mpi-forum mailing list