[Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question

[Dhabaleswar Panda]

Hi Rich,

You can put MPICH2 time frame and a `delta' of 3-6 months.

Thanks,

DK

On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Richard Graham wrote:

> How do you want me to word this on the slide ?  MPICH2 time frame + some delta ?  If so, what is the order of magnitude of the delta, and do we just put the same time frame as MPICH2 ?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Dhabaleswar Panda
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 11:50 AM
> To: Main MPI Forum mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question
>
> Hi Rich,
>
> The upcoming releases of MVAPICH2 will be based on MPICH2 1.5 and successive versions and thus, will support several of the MPI-3 features supported by MPICH2.
>
> Thanks,
>
> DK
>
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Richard Graham wrote:
>
>> As of now I have only received responses on this from Open MPI, MPICH, and SGI.  Do the other implementations want this information included ?  How about Intel, IBM, MVAPICH, NEC, Fujitsu, HP, .... ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rich
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> [mailto:mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Richard
>> Graham
>> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 9:52 PM
>> To: Main MPI Forum mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question
>>
>> Feel free to add these to the list of your responses.
>>
>> Rich
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> [mailto:mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Pavan
>> Balaji
>> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 8:25 PM
>> To: mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question
>>
>>
>> Below is the list for MPICH --
>>
>> On 09/03/2012 07:13 PM, Richard Graham wrote:
>>> - Nonblocking collectives
>>> - MPI Tool Interface
>>> - Distributed Graph
>>> - Noncollective communicator creation
>>
>> Already supported.
>>
>>> - RMA enhancements
>>> - New Fortran bindings
>>> - Sparse collectives
>>> - Enhanced Datatype support
>>
>> November 2012.
>>
>> What about the remaining features that are voted in?
>>
>>  - hindexed_block
>>  - const bindings
>>  - matched probe
>>  - intercomm modifications to not conflict with pt2pt tags
>>  - comm_split_type
>>
>> For MPICH, these are all already supported.
>>
>>  -- Pavan
>>
>> --
>> Pavan Balaji
>> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpi-forum mailing list
>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpi-forum mailing list
>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpi-forum mailing list
>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>>
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>