[Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question

[Kawashima, Takahiro]

Hi Rich,

Sorry for this late reply.

Fujitsu MPI is based on Open MPI and basically follows new versions
of Open MPI. So please fill all fields as "Open MPI+rel delta"
for Fujitsu. The release delta will be within one year or so.

Best regards,
Takahiro Kawashima,
MPI development team,
Fujitsu

> As of now I have only received responses on this from Open MPI, MPICH, and SGI.  Do the other implementations want this information included ?  How about Intel, IBM, MVAPICH, NEC, Fujitsu, HP, .... ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Rich
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Richard Graham
> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 9:52 PM
> To: Main MPI Forum mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question
> 
> Feel free to add these to the list of your responses.
> 
> Rich
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Pavan Balaji
> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 8:25 PM
> To: mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question
> 
> 
> Below is the list for MPICH --
> 
> On 09/03/2012 07:13 PM, Richard Graham wrote:
> > - Nonblocking collectives
> > - MPI Tool Interface
> > - Distributed Graph
> > - Noncollective communicator creation
> 
> Already supported.
> 
> > - RMA enhancements
> > - New Fortran bindings
> > - Sparse collectives
> > - Enhanced Datatype support
> 
> November 2012.
> 
> What about the remaining features that are voted in?
> 
>   - hindexed_block
>   - const bindings
>   - matched probe
>   - intercomm modifications to not conflict with pt2pt tags
>   - comm_split_type
> 
> For MPICH, these are all already supported.
> 
>   -- Pavan
> 
> -- 
> Pavan Balaji
> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji