[Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question

Richard Graham richardg at mellanox.com
Wed Sep 12 11:01:59 CDT 2012


How do you want me to word this on the slide ?  MPICH2 time frame + some delta ?  If so, what is the order of magnitude of the delta, and do we just put the same time frame as MPICH2 ?

-----Original Message-----
From: mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Dhabaleswar Panda
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 11:50 AM
To: Main MPI Forum mailing list
Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question

Hi Rich,

The upcoming releases of MVAPICH2 will be based on MPICH2 1.5 and successive versions and thus, will support several of the MPI-3 features supported by MPICH2.

Thanks,

DK

On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Richard Graham wrote:

> As of now I have only received responses on this from Open MPI, MPICH, and SGI.  Do the other implementations want this information included ?  How about Intel, IBM, MVAPICH, NEC, Fujitsu, HP, .... ?
>
> Thanks,
> Rich
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org 
> [mailto:mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Richard 
> Graham
> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 9:52 PM
> To: Main MPI Forum mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question
>
> Feel free to add these to the list of your responses.
>
> Rich
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org 
> [mailto:mpi-forum-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of Pavan 
> Balaji
> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 8:25 PM
> To: mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> Subject: Re: [Mpi-forum] MPI 3.0 Implementation Question
>
>
> Below is the list for MPICH --
>
> On 09/03/2012 07:13 PM, Richard Graham wrote:
>> - Nonblocking collectives
>> - MPI Tool Interface
>> - Distributed Graph
>> - Noncollective communicator creation
>
> Already supported.
>
>> - RMA enhancements
>> - New Fortran bindings
>> - Sparse collectives
>> - Enhanced Datatype support
>
> November 2012.
>
> What about the remaining features that are voted in?
>
>  - hindexed_block
>  - const bindings
>  - matched probe
>  - intercomm modifications to not conflict with pt2pt tags
>  - comm_split_type
>
> For MPICH, these are all already supported.
>
>  -- Pavan
>
> --
> Pavan Balaji
> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>
_______________________________________________
mpi-forum mailing list
mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum




More information about the mpi-forum mailing list