[Mpi-forum] ticket 273

[Bronis R. de Supinski]

Not being in the room does not mean abstain, it means not present.

On Wed, 30 May 2012, Jeff Hammond wrote:

> Given that not being in the room means abstain, this new rule gives me
> a strong incentive to bake laxative-laced brownies when #281 goes up
> for a second vote.
>
> In other words, I agree that the new rules are stupid and that Mohamad
> is quite justified in being annoyed at his ticket being voted down
> since it was clearly favored by everyone who cared to voice an
> opinion.
>
> Jeff
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Jeff Squyres <jsquyres at cisco.com> wrote:
>> On May 30, 2012, at 3:34 PM, Mohamad Chaarawi wrote:
>>
>>> If the abstains are because people don't care or don't understand what is being voted on or missed the vote (which are the reasons why I vote abstain), then the new voting rule doesn't really make sense.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Squyres
>> jsquyres at cisco.com
>> For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpi-forum mailing list
>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>
>
>
> -- 
> Jeff Hammond
> Argonne Leadership Computing Facility
> University of Chicago Computation Institute
> jhammond at alcf.anl.gov / (630) 252-5381
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffhammond
> https://wiki.alcf.anl.gov/parts/index.php/User:Jhammond
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>