[Mpi-forum] MPI-2.2 errata tickets - may be urgent

[Dave Goodell]

On Feb 18, 2012, at 4:35 PM CST, Rolf Rabenseifner wrote:

> Rich,
> 
> please can you add #196 to the agenda.
> It is short and should still fit into the Tuesday 12:30-4:30pm slot.
> It really needs reading + 2 votes.

#196 will not go quickly and should not be handled entirely in 1 meeting.

> I agree with Dave on
>>>> #166, #170, #172, #177, #179, #181, #183, #186, #191, #197,
>>>> #201, and #202 are all trivial text changes 
> (I withdrew #200 because it is in #260)
> 
> #178 is also trivial.
> 
> #198 needs discussion but is also trivial, i.e., can be done in May.
> Or as you said:
>>>> My personal view is that this ticket is a waste of time.

Also, it's purely a formatting issue.  No need to deal with it as a ticket.

> With the C++ tickets, I've a little bit different view:
> #192 is trivial and should be added into MPI-2.2-Errata
> because it cannot be fixed in MPI-3.0 if we remove all C++.
> 
> #59 and #190 are C++ interface changes and require 2 votes and 
> should be rejected because C++ is deprecated.

Fine by me.

> #176 should be handled by the I/O chapter committee, but
> I expect that the current text is okay (but a bit strange)
> and the ticket should be therefore withdrawn.
> 
> #261 should also be withdrawn, because in many other arguments
> we have the same meaning of OUT.
> 
> #193, and #199 are already withdrawn.
> 
> And #171 bhas already passed.

-Dave