[Mpi-forum] MPI_WAIT/MPI_TEST and generalized, I/O, and NBC requests

Graham, Richard L. rlgraham at ornl.gov
Tue Feb 14 13:51:58 CST 2012


Chapter committee should be fine - we don't need a change-log for NBC (it is not in a release version of the standard, so no change to log), but have not yet looked at the other two areas.

Rich

On Feb 14, 2012, at 9:43 PM, Torsten Hoefler wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:10:42PM +0000, Fab Tillier wrote:
>> I made a ticket for this, 321, so I could track it and have a way of
>> posting a PDF for folks to take a look (e.g. I'd like the chapter
>> authors for NBC, I/O, and generalized requests to agree to the
>> wording).  Beyond that, I don't care how this eventually gets checked
>> into the approved branch, and am happy just merging it and marking it
>> as ticket0 and omitting the changelog entry if that's what folks want.
>> 
>> So far we have:
>> 
>> In favor of full ticket:
>> - Rolf
>> 
>> In favor of chapter committee:
>> - Bill
>> - Dave
>> - Bronis
>> 
>> I'd like to see at least Rich (pt2pt), Torsten (coll), and Rajeev
>> (I/O) chime in with their preference.
> I already indicated my preference a week ago. I was against a ticket and
> pro chapter committee. We should lump this into the bulk ticket-0
> tickets we have lying around.
> 
> Torsten
> 
> -- 
> bash$ :(){ :|:&};: --------------------- http://www.unixer.de/ -----
> Torsten Hoefler         | Performance Modeling and Simulation Lead
> Blue Waters Directorate | University of Illinois (UIUC)
> 1205 W Clark Street     | Urbana, IL, 61801
> NCSA Building           | +01 (217) 244-7736
> _______________________________________________
> mpi-forum mailing list
> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum





More information about the mpi-forum mailing list