[Mpi-forum] Draft standard - take II

[Fab Tillier]

Jeff, you're not the only one confused...

I thought there was something we had to look at from the repository, but I don't see any useful PDFs.  

Assuming I have to build my own, does anyone have instructions for how to set this up for Windows?  

I got nothing from comparing the .tex files but a headache.

-Fab

Jeff Squyres wrote on Mon, 1 Nov 2010 at 10:44:55

> On Nov 1, 2010, at 8:49 AM, Graham, Richard L. wrote:
> 
>> The pdf generated from current trunk, which is the "golden version"
>> and should include only Forum agreed upon changes, should be compared
>> against the 2.2 pdf.  There have been a small number of corrections
>> made in the current trunk - obvious typo's, capitalization errors,
>> etc., but these have been explicitly coordinated with Bill and myself.
> 
> Er... what?
> 
> I see both the trunk and the https://svn.mpi-forum.org/svn/mpi-forum-
> docs/branches/MPI-3.0-2010-11-draft branch, both of which have commits
> in the past 1 business day.
> 
> Which one is the PDF coming from?  Which one should be reviewed?  What
> is the "other" SVN branch that you just mentioned to Pavan in an email
> about the hybrid chapter?
> 
> :-(
> 
>> I am assuming that after tomorrow no more input will be inbound, and
>> we will proceed with final preparation of draft standard.
> 
> I do not believe that that is a good idea.  I do not know what to
> review, and therefore have not done any.  Indeed, things keep changing,
> so even if I knew what SVN tree to review, *when* exactly do I review
> it?  (i.e., what r number of what branch)
> 
> Am I the only one that is confused, or am I the only one publicly
> saying that I am confused?
> 
> Also, you still didn't answer my question about who exactly has to
> respond...
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Rich
>> 
>> 
>> On 11/1/10 7:57 AM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquyres at cisco.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Bill / Rich --
>> 
>> I never saw detailed instructions about what we were supposed to do
>> (e.g., review trunk vs. branch, etc.).  Did I miss them?  (e.g., I
>> asked a question about the process on Oct. 26 that was not answered
>> about who exactly is supposed to "report in" about text being complete)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 26, 2010, at 10:48 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>> 
>>> On Oct 26, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Rolf Rabenseifner wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> Additionally, there were frontmatter changes yesterday on the trunk
>>>>> last night that were made after the branch. Do they need to come
>>>>> over to the branch?
>>>> 
>>>> Which branch? What is going on?
>>> 
>>> Bill / Rich --
>>> 
>>> Can you explain exactly what is the process for this draft document?
>>> I made the branch yesterday, but even I am somewhat confused by the
>>> process at this point.
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Jeff Squyres
>>> jsquyres at cisco.com
>>> For corporate legal information go to:
>>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Jeff Squyres
>> jsquyres at cisco.com
>> For corporate legal information go to:
>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpi-forum mailing list
>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpi-forum mailing list
>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
> 
>