[mpiwg-tools] Extra meetings

[Mohror, Kathryn]

Hi all,

Anyone else want to chime in before we make a final decision? I'll give it a couple days, and then start planning based on the responses (which appear to be unanimous for adding more meetings).

Kathryn


_________________________________________________________________
Kathryn Mohror, kathryn at llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/ 
Scalability Team @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA


> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpiwg-tools [mailto:mpiwg-tools-bounces at mpi-forum.org] On Behalf
> Of Kathryn Mohror
> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 12:32 PM
> To: MPI Forum <mpiwg-tools at lists.mpi-forum.org>
> Subject: [mpiwg-tools] Extra meetings
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Last week on the call, we discussed an issue that has come up:  While people
> like the division between "tools calls" and "debugger calls" (where we focus
> on one topic area at each bi-weekly meeting), that means that we only talk
> about tools or debuggers once a month. This limits the amount of progress
> we can make significantly, and the likelihood that we need to rehash old
> news increases since so much time has passed.
> 
> An idea was to increase the frequency of Tools WG meetings to weekly, and
> then continue to alternate "tools calls" and "debugger calls" so that now each
> will meet bi-weekly instead of monthly. This idea was agreeable to the folks
> on the call on March 24, but since it was a "tools call" there were not very
> many debugger people attending. So, I am sending this email to try to get a
> feel of what the larger group thinks.
> 
> How do debugger people feel about this idea? Do you have the cycles to
> devote to a bi-weekly meeting? (We could always cancel one if progress has
> been slowed for some reason) Do you have the alternating 8:00 AM/11:00
> AM slot free?
> 
> Okay, in a (possibly futile) attempt to streamline this, I have made a doodle
> poll to get feedback on this:
> http://doodle.com/poll/hpnksh527ptt5kqp
> 
> FILL IT OUT NOW. IT IS EASY. THERE ARE ONLY TWO QUESTIONS :-)
> 
> Kathryn
> __________________________________________________________
> _______
> Kathryn Mohror, kathryn at llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/ Scalability Team
> @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-tools mailing list
> mpiwg-tools at mpi-forum.org
> http://secure-web.cisco.com/1viitSY8xM8b1yS-zM8hja-
> QXiG7bri4kOWrqgsZxNawaR2lou7iStOEbP2JhcPogJf6pHDvXHsw3vbpveyU8i_
> yDgFTRJxMRpZtBu8h7G9ulxT6pwuTbC94iw5OZgLhbAITJSa3Ekq0S4czszNXySX
> oup8GiUy5fGG7y4wbTEhG-950kc1Ql47YmFKLuo6HBWuVVJZqYHrg-p_lQPcE-
> bsD21cO1jp78HOYs6MpMgYnuQVft5CxETeATl1a9_rRhXGbu6Z76LPMr4n-
> XJEAx17PoRHMh7zclbiLUUR1vUqh-
> zfmzN36BIaJTlY030eauVqhcGZoWFSZjkqoM6upx4LtHkinSS_3Egx18DIx7Om0/
> http%3A%2F%2Flists.mpi-forum.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo.cgi%2Fmpiwg-
> tools