[mpiwg-tools] being_debugged issue #5

[Marc-Andre Hermanns]

Hi Jeff,

On the being debugged issue, we had trouble finding the right text in
the right changeset.

On the mpi-forum issue #5

https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/5

which we use as the basis for the reading (right?), the text in the
issue description and the provided PDF does not seem to fit to the
pull request associated with it

https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpir/pull/1/files

Specifically, we are unable to find the new sentence: "If the variable
exists in any MPI process, it is required that the variable is present
in all MPI processes."

Could you double check this?

Also, something I just realized. Don't we have a

"One line per sentence."

convention for our LaTeX sources? This makes it easier to read changes
within sentences. The pull request seems to have some form of line
wrapping in place. Can we update this to the one-line-per-sentence
convention?

Cheers,
Marc-Andre
-- 
Marc-Andre Hermanns
Jülich Aachen Research Alliance,
High Performance Computing (JARA-HPC)
Jülich Supercomputing Centre (JSC)

Schinkelstrasse 2
52062 Aachen
Germany

Phone: +49 2461 61 2509 | +49 241 80 24381
Fax: +49 2461 80 6 99753
www.jara.org/jara-hpc
email: hermanns at jara.rwth-aachen.de

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4899 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-tools/attachments/20151106/5aae5ee2/attachment.bin>