[mpiwg-tools] Ticket #383 -- Final text?

[Kathryn Mohror]

Jeff, since you wrote this text, what do you think of Martin’s comments?

Kathryn

_________________________________________________________________
Kathryn Mohror, kathryn at llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/
Scalability Team @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA,
USA






On 5/17/14, 11:35 PM, "Martin Schulz" <schulzm at llnl.gov> wrote:

>Hi Kathryn, all,
>
>A few comments:
>- "Adhere to the same definition from the MPI implementation.” - not sure
>what we meant with this anymore. Perhaps we should just drop this part.
>- "OUT index values” is not correct, since index values are IN parameters
>to the get_info calls. Perhaps just drop OUT?
>- The mandate of equal OUT/INPUT values is also not quite right - for the
>strings, it’s OK to return substrings of the size argument is too small. I
>know that’s a technicality, but I am not sure if this causes problems
>later down the road.
>
>The rest looks good to me.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Martin
>
>
>				
>			
>		
>	
>
>________________________________________________________________________
>Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/
>CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On 5/15/14, 2:55 PM, "Kathryn Mohror" <kathryn at llnl.gov> wrote:
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>Here¹s the draft for ticket #383 that we want to have voted on in June.
>>That means we need to send out the final version on Monday May 19. So,
>>have a look and speak up if you don¹t like it ASAP!
>>
>>Kathryn
>>
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________
>>Kathryn Mohror, kathryn at llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/
>>Scalability Team @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA,
>>USA
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>mpiwg-tools mailing list
>mpiwg-tools at lists.mpi-forum.org
>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-tools