[mpiwg-tools] Ticket #383 -- Final text?

Martin Schulz schulzm at llnl.gov
Sun May 18 01:35:38 CDT 2014

Hi Kathryn, all,

A few comments:
- "Adhere to the same definition from the MPI implementation.” - not sure
what we meant with this anymore. Perhaps we should just drop this part.
- "OUT index values” is not correct, since index values are IN parameters
to the get_info calls. Perhaps just drop OUT?
- The mandate of equal OUT/INPUT values is also not quite right - for the
strings, it’s OK to return substrings of the size argument is too small. I
know that’s a technicality, but I am not sure if this causes problems
later down the road.

The rest looks good to me.




Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/
CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA

On 5/15/14, 2:55 PM, "Kathryn Mohror" <kathryn at llnl.gov> wrote:

>Hi all,
>Here¹s the draft for ticket #383 that we want to have voted on in June.
>That means we need to send out the final version on Monday May 19. So,
>have a look and speak up if you don¹t like it ASAP!
>Kathryn Mohror, kathryn at llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/
>Scalability Team @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA,

More information about the mpiwg-tools mailing list