[Mpi3-tools] Bad handle return error code
Schulz, Martin
schulzm at llnl.gov
Thu Jul 25 17:15:00 CDT 2013
Yes, I agree - the handle is invalid in the session referenced in the argument. Therefore MPI_T_ERR_INVALID_SESSION seems reasonable to me.
Martin
On Jul 25, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Kathryn Mohror <kathryn at llnl.gov>
wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I got asked a question from Nathan:
>
> What should (MPI_T_pvar_read, _write, _reset, etc) return if bad handle is given?
>
> He gave this example of erroneous code:
> {
> MPI_T_pvar_session session1, session2;
> MPI_T_pvar_handle handle;
> char buffer[256];
> int count;
>
> MPI_T_pvar_session_create (&session1);
> MPI_T_pvar_session_create (&session2);
>
> MPI_T_pvar_handle_alloc (session1, 0, NULL, &handle, &count);
>
> MPI_T_pvar_start (session1, handle);
>
> /* erroneus statement. should return MPI_T_ERR_INVALID_SESSION or MPI_T_ERR_INVALID_HANDLE */
> MPI_T_pvar_read (session2, handle, buffer);
> }
>
> I argue it should return MPI_T_ERR_INVALID_HANDLE since the session is good, it's just that the handle doesn’t match.
>
> Do you all agree? If so, we should specify it since it's ambiguous. I believe this is an errata item.
>
> Kathryn
> ______________________________________________________________
> Kathryn Mohror, kathryn at llnl.gov, http://people.llnl.gov/mohror1
> CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mpi3-tools mailing list
> Mpi3-tools at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-tools
________________________________________________________________________
Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov, http://people.llnl.gov/schulzm
CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA
More information about the mpiwg-tools
mailing list