[mpiwg-tools] Tools WG webex tomorrow!

[Schulz, Martin]

On Aug 26, 2013, at 11:07 PM, Kathryn Mohror <kathryn at llnl.gov<mailto:kathryn at llnl.gov>>
 wrote:


What about MPI_T_PVAR_HANDLE_FREE?  That takes a (session, handle) tuple, but doesn't have the text about MPI_T_ERR_INVALID_HANDLE.

I will add this to the handle_free text. Alternatively, I could put this text right after the handle_alloc text:

For any routine that takes both handle and session arguments, if the handle argument passed in is not associated with the session argument, MPI_T_ERR_INVALID_HANDLE is returned.

Actually, I don't think that is specific enough. How about:

For all routines in the rest of this section that take both handle and session arguments, if the handle argument passed in is not associated with the session argument, MPI_T_ERR_INVALID_HANDLE is returned.

Not to be nit-picky, but the alloc routines also has a handle and a session argument and doesn't apply there. I think we have to say "take both handle and session arguments as IN arguments".

Martin



Kathryn

______________________________________________________________
Kathryn Mohror, kathryn at llnl.gov<mailto:kathryn at llnl.gov>, http://people.llnl.gov/mohror1
CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA




_______________________________________________
mpiwg-tools mailing list
mpiwg-tools at lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:mpiwg-tools at lists.mpi-forum.org>
http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-tools

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-tools/attachments/20130826/873eed8d/attachment-0001.html>