[mpiwg-rma] MPI RMA status summary

Jeff Hammond jeff.science at gmail.com
Thu Sep 25 09:34:50 CDT 2014

Per the history therein,
https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/369 passed the
first vote in Chicago in June.  Why do you think it has been dropped?

I thought https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/359
passed but there's no clear evidence of this on the ticket.

I previously updated
https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/wiki/mpi3-rma-agenda to
reflect my intended activities:

Draft Agenda for MPI-3 RMA Working Group: December 2014

#396 - RMA needs new assertions for passive-target epochs. Current
status (3/14): Add these assertions. Text needed.
#397 - extend the use of MPI_WIN_SHARED_QUERY to all windows. Current
status (3/14): Text proposed, straw vote 4/2/0.
#401 - MPI_IN_PLACE in MPI_Get_accumulate
#416 - MPI Accumulate operation restrictions

In particular, I will have a relatively large proposal related to
shared memory, which will be part of #397 (the scope of this ticket is


On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 9:19 AM, William Gropp <wgropp at illinois.edu> wrote:
> I looked through all of the tickets and wrote a summary of the open issues, which I’ve attached.  I propose the following:
> Determine which of these issues can be resolved by email.  A significant number can probably be closed with no further action.
> For those requiring rework, determine if there is still interest in them, and if not, close them as well.
> For the ones requiring discussion, assign someone to organize a position and discussion.  We can schedule telecons to go over those issues.  The first item in the list is certainly in this class.
> Comments?
> Bill
> _______________________________________________
> mpiwg-rma mailing list
> mpiwg-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpiwg-rma

Jeff Hammond
jeff.science at gmail.com

More information about the mpiwg-rma mailing list