[mpiwg-rma] Single RMA synchronization for several window handles

[William Gropp]

If you are going to allow windows with different communicators, then you might as well use separate fence calls.  Otherwise, you are introducing a brand-new kind of object - one that involves the union of non-disjoint groups of processes.  I don’t think this is a good idea.

Bill

William Gropp
Director, Parallel Computing Institute
Thomas M. Siebel Chair in Computer Science
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign





On Aug 8, 2014, at 10:50 AM, Rolf Rabenseifner <rabenseifner at hlrs.de> wrote:

> Dynamic Windows also require that all have the same communicator
> (because same win handle).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-rma/attachments/20140808/a0b6f05b/attachment-0001.html>