[Mpi3-rma] [EXTERNAL] Re: Call for errata

[Barrett, Brian W]

Rolf might like that, but there's really no reason for the title to
include MPI-3.0 errata.  If we want another selector, that makes sense,
but having it in the title just burns good screen real estateŠ

Brian

On 1/28/13 2:23 PM, "Jim Dinan" <dinan at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

>Hi Pavan,
>
>Could you please log these as tickets, so we don't lose any items.
>Please include the exact change, if it's ready.  Also, Rolf would like
>us to use the the following formatting for title/ticket type:
>
>Title: MPI-3.0 errata: xxxxxxxxxxx
>Type: Correction to standard (for upcoming release + errata)
>
>Thanks,
>  ~Jim.
>
>On 1/28/13 2:33 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote:
>> Jim,
>>
>> We talked about a few things in the last Forum.  Slides are online on
>> the Forum page.  I also sent an email about it after the Forum; I can
>> try to dig it up if you can't find it.
>>
>>   -- Pavan
>>
>> On 01/28/2013 09:54 AM US Central Time, Jim Dinan wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> We are assembling the list of RMA errata to be voted on at the March
>>> meeting.  Currently, we have tickets #347, #348, #350, and #355 (I'm
>>> working on official wording for these changes and will circulate it
>>>soon).
>>>
>>> Are there any other errata items that should be included on the agenda
>>> for the upcoming meeting?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>   ~Jim.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpi3-rma mailing list
>>> mpi3-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-rma
>>
>_______________________________________________
>mpi3-rma mailing list
>mpi3-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
>http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-rma
>
>


--
  Brian W. Barrett
  Scalable System Software Group
  Sandia National Laboratories