[Mpi3-rma] Reference implementation / October vote
Underwood, Keith D
keith.d.underwood at intel.com
Tue Oct 11 20:32:14 CDT 2011
I think that is reasonable, but I think the bar will be higher. Did you guys really discuss a solution that would break backward compatibility with the RMA ticket?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpi3-rma-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org [mailto:mpi3-rma-
> bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of James Dinan
> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 9:28 PM
> To: mpi3-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
> Subject: Re: [Mpi3-rma] Reference implementation / October vote
> Is it reasonable to assume that we can break backward compatibility of
> the MPI-3 RMA ticket with a follow-on ticket as long as it happens
> before MPI 3.0 is ratified?
> On 10/11/11 5:45 PM, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
> > All -
> > Given the agenda, have we officially punted on a vote in October?
> > seems bad to me unless we're going to start over; we have an
> > implementation and our other requirements are met. If we're going to
> > a vote, we need to announce the implementation today/tomorrow. The
> > chapter may not be perfect, but it's easily fixed by some very short
> > additions in a follow-on ticket. Sorry I couldn't make the meeting
> > Monday, but Torsten scheduled it while I was hosting a seminar
> > which is one of those things I can't get out of...
> > Brian
> mpi3-rma mailing list
> mpi3-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
More information about the mpiwg-rma