[Mpi3-rma] Reference implementation / October vote

James Dinan dinan at mcs.anl.gov
Tue Oct 11 20:29:31 CDT 2011

PS- I hope this is a stupid question.  :)

On 10/11/11 8:27 PM, James Dinan wrote:
> Is it reasonable to assume that we can break backward compatibility of
> the MPI-3 RMA ticket with a follow-on ticket as long as it happens
> before MPI 3.0 is ratified?
> ~Jim.
> On 10/11/11 5:45 PM, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
>> All -
>> Given the agenda, have we officially punted on a vote in October? This
>> seems bad to me unless we're going to start over; we have an
>> implementation and our other requirements are met. If we're going to have
>> a vote, we need to announce the implementation today/tomorrow. The
>> chapter may not be perfect, but it's easily fixed by some very short
>> additions in a follow-on ticket. Sorry I couldn't make the meeting
>> Monday, but Torsten scheduled it while I was hosting a seminar speaker,
>> which is one of those things I can't get out of...
>> Brian
> _______________________________________________
> mpi3-rma mailing list
> mpi3-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-rma

More information about the mpiwg-rma mailing list