[Mpi3-rma] Reference implementation / October vote

[James Dinan]

PS- I hope this is a stupid question.  :)

On 10/11/11 8:27 PM, James Dinan wrote:
> Is it reasonable to assume that we can break backward compatibility of
> the MPI-3 RMA ticket with a follow-on ticket as long as it happens
> before MPI 3.0 is ratified?
>
> ~Jim.
>
> On 10/11/11 5:45 PM, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
>> All -
>>
>> Given the agenda, have we officially punted on a vote in October? This
>> seems bad to me unless we're going to start over; we have an
>> implementation and our other requirements are met. If we're going to have
>> a vote, we need to announce the implementation today/tomorrow. The
>> chapter may not be perfect, but it's easily fixed by some very short
>> additions in a follow-on ticket. Sorry I couldn't make the meeting
>> Monday, but Torsten scheduled it while I was hosting a seminar speaker,
>> which is one of those things I can't get out of...
>>
>> Brian
>>
> _______________________________________________
> mpi3-rma mailing list
> mpi3-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-rma