[Mpi3-rma] Fwd: Next RMA Telecon

Rajeev Thakur thakur at mcs.anl.gov
Wed Dec 7 12:22:05 CST 2011


A reminder about this telecon on Friday at 2pm Central.

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Torsten Hoefler <htor at illinois.edu>
> Date: November 27, 2011 1:14:07 PM CST
> To: mpi3-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
> Subject: [Mpi3-rma] Next RMA Telecon
> Reply-To: "MPI 3.0 Remote Memory Access working group" <mpi3-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org>
> 
> Hello All,                                                                      
> 
> The doodle poll indicates that everybody can make it on Friday 12/9
> 2pm (I hope Brian can make it). We may need a bit more than 1 hour (it
> would be good to discuss every item on the agenda, so please plan for
> 1.5 hours if possible). The usual call-in information is (thanks to
> Rajeev):                      
> 
> Dial-in Number: 866-654-6744                                                    
> International Dial-in Number: 1-517-308-8226                                    
> Participant Access code: 6086006                                                
> 
> The current agenda draft includes:
> 
> 1) Adam's suggestion that datatype offsets have to be relative to MPI_BOTTOM    
> 2) disp_unit should not be fixed (one can create one window for each)           
> 3) allocate_shared proposal with MPI_Win_lock_all(exclusive)                    
> 4) ticket 300: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/300          
> 5) ticket 283: https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/283          
> 6) Adam suggested: p23, 6-7 Regarding status, we should either say that         
>   all fields are undefined (except for the error) or we should specify         
>   all values, e.g., what about values returned for MPI_GET_COUNT,              
>   MPI_GET_ELEMENTS, or MPI_TEST_CANCELLED? Replace "The values of the          
>   MPI_SOURCE and MPI_TAG fields are undefined." with "All other fields         
>   in status are undefined." -- Question: Would it be useful to set             
>   fields for count and get elements?                                           
> 
> Additions are welcome anytime!
> 
> Some of the questions come from Adam's review (see comments ticket 270).        
> I fixed several ticket 0 things in the proposal. Rajeev reviewed but            
> additional reviews are welcome!                                                 
> 
> All the Best,
>   Torsten
> 
> -- 
> bash$ :(){ :|:&};: --------------------- http://www.unixer.de/ -----
> Torsten Hoefler         | Performance Modeling and Simulation Lead
> Blue Waters Directorate | University of Illinois (UIUC)
> 1205 W Clark Street     | Urbana, IL, 61801
> NCSA Building           | +01 (217) 244-7736
> _______________________________________________
> mpi3-rma mailing list
> mpi3-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-rma





More information about the mpiwg-rma mailing list