[Mpi3-rma] RMA proposal 1 update

[Rajeev Thakur]

I prefer to be explicit about these things because it will be read by
someone who is not familiar with the topic.

Rajev 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpi3-rma-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org 
> [mailto:mpi3-rma-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of 
> Torsten Hoefler
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 10:47 AM
> To: MPI 3.0 Remote Memory Access working group
> Subject: Re: [Mpi3-rma] RMA proposal 1 update
> 
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:36:56AM -0500, Rajeev Thakur wrote:
> > Perhaps we should allow only shared locks with lockall.
> Yes, that was my assumption when I wrote: "Starts a shared RMA access
> epoch to all processes."
> 
> We might argue about the wording. But we should still discuss 
> the whole
> idea in the context of the current spec and non-cache 
> coherent systems.
> 
> All the Best,
>    Torsten
> 
> -- 
>  bash$ :(){ :|:&};: --------------------- http://www.unixer.de/ -----
> Torsten Hoefler         | Research Associate
> Blue Waters Directorate | University of Illinois
> 1205 W Clark Street     | Urbana, IL, 61801
> NCSA Building           | +01 (217) 244-7736
> _______________________________________________
> mpi3-rma mailing list
> mpi3-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-rma
>