[Mpi3-rma] Updated MPI-3 RMA proposal 1

[Pavan Balaji]

On 06/20/2010 06:09 PM, Rajeev Thakur wrote:
>> The problem is that the definition of the "minimal set of 
>> things needed" 
>> is different for different people. That's why this definition 
>> is vague. 
> 
> One definition of inclusion in proposal 1: if feature X is not added, we
> could as well just leave MPI-2 RMA as it is and go home.

That's even more vague than what we had before :-).

  -- Pavan

-- 
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji