[Mpi3-rma] Updated MPI-3 RMA proposal 1
balaji at mcs.anl.gov
Sun Jun 20 18:11:38 CDT 2010
On 06/20/2010 06:09 PM, Rajeev Thakur wrote:
>> The problem is that the definition of the "minimal set of
>> things needed"
>> is different for different people. That's why this definition
>> is vague.
> One definition of inclusion in proposal 1: if feature X is not added, we
> could as well just leave MPI-2 RMA as it is and go home.
That's even more vague than what we had before :-).
More information about the mpiwg-rma