[Mpi3-rma] Updated MPI-3 RMA proposal 1
thakur at mcs.anl.gov
Sun Jun 20 18:09:30 CDT 2010
> The problem is that the definition of the "minimal set of
> things needed"
> is different for different people. That's why this definition
> is vague.
One definition of inclusion in proposal 1: if feature X is not added, we
could as well just leave MPI-2 RMA as it is and go home.
One definition of not including in proposal 1: if feature Y is so really
needed, why is there vehement disagreement?
More information about the mpiwg-rma