[Mpi3-rma] MPI RMW operations
Rajeev Thakur
thakur at mcs.anl.gov
Thu Mar 27 17:05:23 CDT 2008
Some comments:
* Are the semantics supposed to be that the original value at the target is
read and stored at the result_addr on the origin (like a Get), and the
target memory is updated with the result of the reduction operation (like
Accumulate)?
* What are the semantics of the two-operand versions?
* Why is there no count, datatype at the target like in Accumulate?
* When assert == MPI_MODE_PASSIVE_EPOCH_IMPLICIT, what is the lock type for
the Win_lock -- shared or exclusive? Also, Win_unlock takes only two
parameters.
* Regarding the interaction with explicit epochs of Rmw when assert ==
MPI_MODE_PASSIVE_EPOCH_IMPLICIT, it should be the same as the interaction of
its equivalent sequence, namely, Lock - Rmw - Unlock. In other words, there
shouldn't be another epoch around it on the same process (nested epochs not
allowed), and the epochs on other processes must not conflict.
Rajeev
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpi3-rma-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org
> [mailto:mpi3-rma-bounces at lists.mpi-forum.org] On Behalf Of
> Shipman, Galen M.
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 10:10 PM
> To: mpi3-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
> Subject: [Mpi3-rma] MPI RMW operations
>
>
> Howard and I have been working on the RMW operations listed
> below for
> consideration.
>
> - Galen Shipman - ORNL
>
>
> Single operand RMW operations
>
> MPI_Rmw(void *operand_addr,
> int count,
> MPI_Datatype datatype,
> void *result_addr,
> int target_rank,
> MPI_Aint target_disp,
> int assert,
> MPI_RMW_Op op,
> MPI_Win win)
>
>
> Two operand RMW operations
>
> MPI_Rmw2(void *operand_addr,
> int count,
> MPI_Datatype datatype,
> void *operand2_addr,
> void *result_addr,
> int target_rank,
> MPI_Aint target_disp,
> int assert,
> MPI_RMW_2_Op op,
> MPI_Win win)
>
>
>
> MPI_RMW_Op Predefined RMW single operand operations
> The following predefined operations are supplied for MPI_RMW
> and related
> functions. These operations are invoked by placing the
> following in op.
>
> Name Meaning
>
> MPI_RMW_INC increment
> MPI_RMW_PROD product
> MPI_RMW_SUM sum
> MPI_RMW_LAND logical and
> MPI_RMW_LOR logical or
> MPI_RMW_LXOR logical xor
> MPI_RMW_BAND binary and
> MPI_RMW_BOR binary or
> MPI_RMW_BXOR binary xor
> MPI_RMW_SWAP swap value
>
> MPI_RMW_2_Op Predefined RMW two operand operations
>
> Name Meaning
>
> MPI_RMW2_MASK_SWAP swap masked bits
> MPI_RMW2_COMP_SWAP compare and swap
>
> Note: MPI_RMW2_COMP_SWAP is an equality comparison, we may wish to
> consider multiple comparison operations such as >, >=, <, <=, ==, <>.
>
> Both MPI_Rmw and MPI_Rmw2 take an assert argument.
> When assert == MPI_MODE_PASSIVE_EPOCH_IMPLICIT MPI_Rmw/2 is
> equivalent to:
>
> MPI_Win_lock(target_rank,0,win);
> MPI_Rmw(.....);
> MPI_Win_unlock(target_rank,0,win);
>
> When assert == MPI_MODE_PASSIVE_EPOCH_IMPLICIT | MPI_MODE_NOCHECK
> the MPI library knows that the window lock at the target need not be
> acquired.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpi3-rma mailing list
> mpi3-rma at lists.mpi-forum.org
> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-rma
>
>
More information about the mpiwg-rma
mailing list