[mpiwg-persistence] Erratum: Partitioned operations MPI_INFO--first cut
Skjellum, Anthony
Tony-Skjellum at utc.edu
Wed Sep 9 10:56:47 CDT 2020
Dan, actually Ryan is going to try to get Bill to merge part comm chapter soon into the mpi-4.x; this is apparently delayed.
While that will help, it is probably also why I was thinking it OK to do the PR as I did. Ryan is reaching out to Bill today about it.
Nonetheless, I did this intra-repo PR:
https://github.com/mpiwg-persistence/mpi-standard/pull/3
But, that's not readable to anyone but in our WG. Is this what you intended?
For an erratum, do I need to modify the appendices in any way? Since it is in an unfinished area of the doc?
Thanks,
Tony
Anthony Skjellum, PhD
Professor of Computer Science and Chair of Excellence
Director, SimCenter
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (UTC)
tony-skjellum at utc.edu [or skjellum at gmail.com]
cell: 205-807-4968
________________________________
From: HOLMES Daniel <d.holmes at epcc.ed.ac.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 11:47 AM
To: Skjellum, Anthony <Tony-Skjellum at utc.edu>
Cc: mpiwg-persistence at lists.mpi-forum.org <mpiwg-persistence at lists.mpi-forum.org>
Subject: Re: [mpiwg-persistence] Erratum: Partitioned operations MPI_INFO--first cut
Hi Tony,
Easier to review if the PR is done relative to the branch that adds partcomm - this PR#3 shows 1 new commit affecting 1 file, rather than 203 commits affecting 8 files.
https://github.com/mpiwg-persistence/mpi-standard/pull/3
Don’t delete PR 275, though - that will be needed later for inclusion into canonical MPI.
Cheers,
Dan.
—
Dr Daniel Holmes PhD
Architect (HPC Research)
d.holmes at epcc.ed.ac.uk<mailto:d.holmes at epcc.ed.ac.uk>
Phone: +44 (0) 131 651 3465
Mobile: +44 (0) 7940 524 088
Address: Room 2.09, Bayes Centre, 47 Potterrow, Central Area, Edinburgh, EH8 9BT
—
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
—
On 9 Sep 2020, at 16:39, Skjellum, Anthony via mpiwg-persistence <mpiwg-persistence at lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:mpiwg-persistence at lists.mpi-forum.org>> wrote:
Hi, The following has been created for your review:
https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-issues/issues/308
Ryan and I have not hashed through it yet. This was made for the whole WG right away to support maximum review
as we do further improvements between Ryan and me.
There is text, a PR too attached to this:
https://github.com/mpi-forum/mpi-standard/pull/275
Thanks,
Tony
Anthony Skjellum, PhD
Professor of Computer Science and Chair of Excellence
Director, SimCenter
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (UTC)
tony-skjellum at utc.edu<mailto:tony-skjellum at utc.edu> [or skjellum at gmail.com<mailto:skjellum at gmail.com>]
cell: 205-807-4968
_______________________________________________
mpiwg-persistence mailing list
mpiwg-persistence at lists.mpi-forum.org<mailto:mpiwg-persistence at lists.mpi-forum.org>
https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-persistence
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-persistence/attachments/20200909/ab53991d/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the mpiwg-persistence
mailing list