[mpiwg-p2p] [Mpi-forum] Text issues with MPI-3.1 point-to-point chapter as at revision r2030

[William Gropp]

Exactly:)

One question for the forum is whether they want all such inconsistencies fixed in 3.1, or whether the document is now frozen.  

Bill

On Mar 4, 2015, at 2:34 PM, Daniel Holmes <dholmes at epcc.ed.ac.uk> wrote:

> Hi Bill,
> 
> Oh ok, I see now - those variables are of type INTEGER continued from the previous line of code. As this sort of continuation should be more indented then the formatting is fine in the new document for these two lines.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dan.
> 
> On 04/03/2015 11:55, William Gropp wrote:
>> What’s incorrect?  The style for the binding is that the continuation lines should be indented.  There were many inconsistencies in prior versions and I’ve tried to find and fix these (I’ve missed some, including new ones such as p 79, line 32, which is in fact incorrectly indented).
>> 
>> Bill
>> 
>> On Mar 4, 2015, at 1:13 PM, Daniel Holmes <dholmes at epcc.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
>> 
>>> page 79 line 42: white space indenting is incorrect
>>> 
>>> page 80 line 33: white space indenting is incorrect
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Dan Holmes
> Applications Consultant in HPC Research
> EPCC, The University of Edinburgh
> James Clerk Maxwell Building
> The Kings Buildings
> Peter Guthrie Tait Road 
> Edinburgh
> EH9 3FD
> T: +44(0)131 651 3465
> E: dholmes at epcc.ed.ac.uk
> 
> *Please consider the environment before printing this email.*
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-p2p/attachments/20150304/68e4233a/attachment-0001.html>