[mpiwg-p2p] [Mpi-forum] Text issues with MPI-3.1 point-to-point chapter as at revision r2030

Daniel Holmes dholmes at epcc.ed.ac.uk
Wed Mar 4 14:34:31 CST 2015

Hi Bill,

Oh ok, I see now - those variables are of type INTEGER continued from 
the previous line of code. As this sort of continuation should be more 
indented then the formatting is fine in the new document for these two 


On 04/03/2015 11:55, William Gropp wrote:
> What’s incorrect?  The style for the binding is that the continuation 
> lines should be indented.  There were many inconsistencies in prior 
> versions and I’ve tried to find and fix these (I’ve missed some, 
> including new ones such as p 79, line 32, which is in fact incorrectly 
> indented).
> Bill
> On Mar 4, 2015, at 1:13 PM, Daniel Holmes <dholmes at epcc.ed.ac.uk 
> <mailto:dholmes at epcc.ed.ac.uk>> wrote:
>> page 79 line 42: white space indenting is incorrect
>> page 80 line 33: white space indenting is incorrect

Dan Holmes
Applications Consultant in HPC Research
EPCC, The University of Edinburgh
James Clerk Maxwell Building
The Kings Buildings
Peter Guthrie Tait Road
T: +44(0)131 651 3465
E: dholmes at epcc.ed.ac.uk

*Please consider the environment before printing this email.*

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-p2p/attachments/20150304/250c6e84/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: not available
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-p2p/attachments/20150304/250c6e84/attachment-0001.ksh>

More information about the mpiwg-p2p mailing list