[Mpiwg-large-counts] [Mpi-forum] December 2014 Meeting / Agenda

[Jeff Hammond]

1/2 day is fine.  Sorry for the delay...

Thanks!

Jeff

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Schulz Martin <schulzm at llnl.gov> wrote:
> Sure, no problem - 1/2 day WG time enough or should be schedule more/less?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Martin
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/
> CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA
>
>
>
>
>
> On 11/4/14, 8:30 AM, "Jeff Hammond" <jeff.science at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi Martin,
>>
>>I would like to have a large-count WG session or two to discuss the
>>following tickets:
>>- https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/34 and
>>https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/338
>>- https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/423
>>- https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/430
>>- (optionally) https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/457
>>
>>Background for this request can be found in
>>https://github.com/jeffhammond/BigMPI-paper/blob/master/exampi14_resubmiss
>>ion_3.pdf?raw=true.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Jeff
>>
>>On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Schulz Martin <schulzm at llnl.gov> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I put up an initial roster for the December meeting in San Jose. As
>>>usual, I
>>> am planning to arrange WG meeting in the beginning of the meeting (until
>>> Tuesday noon or evening depending on the requests that I get), followed
>>>by
>>> the plenaries. Votes will be Thursday morning.
>>>
>>> For the plenaries, I would like to try something different, based on the
>>> experience at the forum in Japan: instead of having a fixed schedule,
>>>I¹ll
>>> put up a list of topics that we need to cover and we¹ll go through them
>>>in
>>> order, but not necessarily with a fixed schedule. We basically followed
>>>this
>>> scheme in Japan (out of necessity since we had to redo the agenda on
>>>the fly
>>> due to the missed quorum) and this worked fairly well and allowed for
>>>enough
>>> discussions for the topics that needed them. I¹ll still try to keep
>>>track of
>>> overall time to make sure we get through with the agenda, in particular
>>>with
>>> the items to be voted on, but I would like to avoid that this dictates
>>>the
>>> schedule.
>>>
>>> For the WG leads: please send me any requests for WG time or plenary
>>>items
>>> as soon as you can (even if you need to revise that later), so we can
>>>start
>>> building a more concrete agenda. Also, please let me know of any tickets
>>> that you want read or voted on as part of errata. I have pre-populated
>>>the
>>> agenda with the second and first votes, since those are fixed ­ but
>>>please
>>> also double check those. The deadline for announcing tickets for
>>>readings or
>>> votes is as usual 2 weeks before the forum, which is the Monday 11/24,
>>>I.e.,
>>> the Monday of Thanksgiving week.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________________________________________________
>>> Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/
>>> CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpi-forum mailing list
>>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Jeff Hammond
>>jeff.science at gmail.com
>>http://jeffhammond.github.io/
>
>



-- 
Jeff Hammond
jeff.science at gmail.com
http://jeffhammond.github.io/