[Mpiwg-large-counts] [Mpi-forum] December 2014 Meeting / Agenda

[Schulz Martin]

Sure, no problem - 1/2 day WG time enough or should be schedule more/less?

Thanks,

Martin

________________________________________________________________________
Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/
CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA





On 11/4/14, 8:30 AM, "Jeff Hammond" <jeff.science at gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi Martin,
>
>I would like to have a large-count WG session or two to discuss the
>following tickets:
>- https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/34 and
>https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/338
>- https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/423
>- https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/430
>- (optionally) https://svn.mpi-forum.org/trac/mpi-forum-web/ticket/457
>
>Background for this request can be found in
>https://github.com/jeffhammond/BigMPI-paper/blob/master/exampi14_resubmiss
>ion_3.pdf?raw=true.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Jeff
>
>On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Schulz Martin <schulzm at llnl.gov> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I put up an initial roster for the December meeting in San Jose. As
>>usual, I
>> am planning to arrange WG meeting in the beginning of the meeting (until
>> Tuesday noon or evening depending on the requests that I get), followed
>>by
>> the plenaries. Votes will be Thursday morning.
>>
>> For the plenaries, I would like to try something different, based on the
>> experience at the forum in Japan: instead of having a fixed schedule,
>>I¹ll
>> put up a list of topics that we need to cover and we¹ll go through them
>>in
>> order, but not necessarily with a fixed schedule. We basically followed
>>this
>> scheme in Japan (out of necessity since we had to redo the agenda on
>>the fly
>> due to the missed quorum) and this worked fairly well and allowed for
>>enough
>> discussions for the topics that needed them. I¹ll still try to keep
>>track of
>> overall time to make sure we get through with the agenda, in particular
>>with
>> the items to be voted on, but I would like to avoid that this dictates
>>the
>> schedule.
>>
>> For the WG leads: please send me any requests for WG time or plenary
>>items
>> as soon as you can (even if you need to revise that later), so we can
>>start
>> building a more concrete agenda. Also, please let me know of any tickets
>> that you want read or voted on as part of errata. I have pre-populated
>>the
>> agenda with the second and first votes, since those are fixed ­ but
>>please
>> also double check those. The deadline for announcing tickets for
>>readings or
>> votes is as usual 2 weeks before the forum, which is the Monday 11/24,
>>I.e.,
>> the Monday of Thanksgiving week.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________________________________________
>> Martin Schulz, schulzm at llnl.gov, http://scalability.llnl.gov/
>> CASC @ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USA
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpi-forum mailing list
>> mpi-forum at lists.mpi-forum.org
>> http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi-forum
>
>
>
>-- 
>Jeff Hammond
>jeff.science at gmail.com
>http://jeffhammond.github.io/