[mpiwg-hybridpm] GitHub Discussions

[Benson Muite]

Hi Jim,
Have not found Slack very useful for this. Find some level of mailbox 
notifications are useful, though discussion can occur on another platform.
Benson
On 2/14/22 5:59 PM, Jim Dinan wrote:
> Hi Benson,
>
> These are all good suggestions. My concern is that this is a 
> relatively small group, and dividing our attention across several 
> different platforms could be counterproductive. Presently we have 
> email, slack, github, and regular meetings. If we can get the 
> engagement that we're looking for without adding another platform, I 
> think I would prefer to try that first, even if it's not perfect. This 
> was the rationale for enabling GitHub discussions, but we don't seem 
> to be using them yet. Would be interested to hear from you and others 
> if you feel that we're missing something that could 
> significantly boost productivity or engagement.
>
> Cheers,
>  ~Jim.
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 2:37 AM Benson Muite via mpiwg-hybridpm 
> <mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org 
> <mailto:mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Jim,
>
>     Thanks for setting this up and reposting slides, this enables
>     efficient tracking of discussions without needing to watch many
>     long recordings to find the relevant snippet of information from a
>     working group session. Would you consider trying out software such as:
>     Discourse - https://www.discourse.org/ <https://www.discourse.org/>
>     Loomio - https://www.loomio.com/ <https://www.loomio.com/>
>     Decidim - https://decidim.org <https://decidim.org>
>     Discussions really ties in to just one platform and may not be
>     helpful for straw polls.  If so, would be happy to run one of
>     these on a cloud provider. These also have filtered mailing list
>     modes, and allow grouping of discussions by topic. Other tools
>     such as Redmine or Jira could also help structure technical
>     discussions better and have good Git integration.
>
>     Regards,
>     Benson
>
>     On 1/28/22 12:24 AM, Jim Dinan via mpiwg-hybridpm wrote:
>>     Hi All,
>>
>>     You might have received an announcement that I enabled
>>     discussions on GitHub. I'm hopeful that this will give us an
>>     online forum that works a little better for discussion than
>>     issues, which can become hard to follow when there is a lot of
>>     discussion. Please feel free to try it out:
>>     https://github.com/mpiwg-hybrid/hybrid-issues/discussions
>>     <https://github.com/mpiwg-hybrid/hybrid-issues/discussions>
>>
>>      ~Jim.
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>>     mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org  <mailto:mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>>     https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-hybridpm  <https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-hybridpm>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     mpiwg-hybridpm mailing list
>     mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org
>     <mailto:mpiwg-hybridpm at lists.mpi-forum.org>
>     https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-hybridpm
>     <https://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpiwg-hybridpm>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpi-forum.org/pipermail/mpiwg-hybridpm/attachments/20220215/515e6793/attachment.html>